Tennessee for Ron Paul 2012: ron paul israel

Showing posts with label ron paul israel. Show all posts

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Ron Paul is Pro Israel

In 1981, Ron Paul was one of the only members of Congress to defend Israel's right to bomb Iraq's Osiraq Nuclear Reactor. While almost all other members of the US Government and the world condemned Israel's defensive actions, Ron Paul stood up for Israel's right to defend herself.
Ron Paul wants to stop giving your hard earned money to all foreign nations/governments. Did you know that the U.S. Government gives THREE times more of your tax dollars to Israel's Arab Enemies than it does to Israel?
Israel has a couple of hundred nuclear weapons and has stood against the United Nations and refused to sign the Non Nuclear Proliferation Treaty. Israel has asserted her sovereignty and she should be respected.
We should not be in the business of coercing Israel into checking with us before taking defensive action against her enemies, but that is just what the Federal Government does when we dole out foreign aid to Israel and her enemies. Remember the Biblical Principle "the borrower is slave to the lender"?
"The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender." Proverbs 22:7

learn more:
http://www.americansforisrael.com/americans-for-israel-flyer-ready-for-2012/

Ron Paul's Pro American Foreign Policy:

http://www.tennesseeforronpaul.com/2011/12/i-like-ron-paul-except-for-his-foreign_14.html

"I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal Savior, and I endeavor every day to follow Him in all I do and in every position I advocate." -Ron Paul

My faith is a deeply private issue to me, and I don't speak on it in great detail during my speeches because I want to avoid any appearance of exploiting it for political gain. Let me be very clear here: I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal Savior, and I endeavor every day to follow Him in all I do and in every position I advocate.

It is God Who gave us life. As He is free, so are those He created in His image. Our rights to life and liberty are inalienable.

I'm running for President of the United States because I believe that our traditions and way of life are under attack from an out-of-control federal government and reckless politicians who show no regard for what our Founders entrusted to our protection.

America became the greatest nation in human history because a dedicated band of Patriots believed their God-given rights were worth fighting for, even if it meant challenging the world's most powerful nation in what many deemed a "hopeless" cause.

Being free meant so much to our forefathers that they put everything on the line -- and thousands sacrificed their lives -- to give the promise of liberty to not only their children and grandchildren, but to generations they knew they would never even meet.

Their courage and determination guaranteed they would defy the odds and achieve victory.

In this critical election, you and I must decide if the principles of limited government and personal freedom are worth fighting for once again.

Since I'm asking for your vote and your trust to lead this nation, let me tell you a little bit about my background and beliefs.

My parents raised my four brothers and me on a dairy near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where they set clear examples for each of us about faith, honest living, and individual responsibility. Their Christian values helped inspire two of my brothers to eventually enter the ministry, and provided me with the foundation I needed to practice medicine and one day become a U.S. Representative.

In addition to my time in Congress, I am proud to have delivered over 4,000 babies as a country doctor in Texas. As I trained to practice medicine, I became convinced without a doubt that life begins at the moment of conception. I never performed an abortion, and I never once found an abortion necessary to save the life of the mother. In fact, I successfully helped women struggling with their pregnancies to seek other options, including adoption.

I am running to Restore America Now, and by that I mean that it's time to protect and promote the basic God-given rights inherent in the promise of America.

We must pass on our heritage of liberty to the next generation -- not tens of trillions of dollars in debt and liabilities.

We must stand for life -- not allow millions of innocent children to continue to be slaughtered with the government's approval.

We must follow the Biblical mandate of using honest weights and measures -- not printing money out of thin air in almost complete secrecy and then handing it over to oppressive dictators.

We must only send our men and women to fight for our country when the mission is clear, every necessary tool needed to win is provided, and we respect the Constitution by declaring war.

Once war is declared, it must be waged according to Just War principles. We should only fight when it's in our national security interest, and we should no longer do the corrupt United Nation's bidding by policing the world.

In Congress, I never vote for any piece of legislation that violates the Constitution's strict limits on government power. I also do not participate in the congressional pension system.

As President, I give you my word that I will only exercise my authority within the confines of the Constitution, and I will work every day to rein in a runaway federal government by binding it with the chains of that document.

For my stands and beliefs, I am told that my efforts are "hopeless." Like those who were proud to stand up for what they knew was right to create our nation, however, I firmly believe that now is a better time than ever before to reclaim our liberties. No situation is hopeless for those who receive their strength from their faith, family, and freedom.

And like those Patriots, I have no doubt that liberty will prevail.

I invite you to join me and millions of other Americans in taking our stand to honor our forefathers' sacrifices and Restore America Now.

learn more about Ron Paul:

http://ronpaul2012.com/

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Ron Paul: I don't want Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon

Ron Paul:

"I don't want them (Iran) to have a weapon, we have to be careful, we have to contain them (Iran) if they do get one"

Last spring, Israel’s former spy chief, Meir Dagan, said bombing Iran would be “a stupid idea” for Israel. It would mean regional war and give Iran “the best possible reason to continue its nuclear program.”

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/11/13/2498205/what-not-to-do-about-iran.html#storylink=cpy

Israeli Mossad Chief AGREES with Ron Paul, an Iran Nuke is not a threat to Israel:
"Mossad chief Tamir Pardo addressed a conclave of Israeli ambassadors in Jerusalem on Thursday, saying that Israel’s existence is not inevitably endangered by Iran acquiring an atomic weapon"
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/29/israeli-spy-chief-downplays-iranian-nuke-threat/

Meir Dagan, Former Israeli Mossad Chief, says bombing Iran would be a STUPID IDEA:

Israel’s former spy chief, Meir Dagan, said bombing Iran would be “a stupid idea” for Israel.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/11/13/2498205/what-not-to-do-about-iran.html#storylink=cpy

"Israel’s former intelligence chief has said that a strike on Iran’s nuclear installations would be “a stupid idea,”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/09/world/middleeast/09israel.html

"Meir Dagan, Israel's recently retired intelligence chief who spent eight years trying to sabotage Iran's nuclear program, has declared a military strike against that contentious project "is the stupidest thing I've ever heard."

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Special/2011/05/12/Israeli-ex-spy-boss-Iran-strike-stupid/UPI-26601305220688/#ixzz1MAMEIAt3

"Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1968 and ratified it in 1970, making Iran's nuclear program subject to International Atomic Energy Agency verification."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran

"The incoming head of the United Nation's nuclear watchdog said on Friday he did not see any hard evidence that Iran was trying to gain the ability to develop nuclear weapons."
http://www.haaretz.com/news/incoming-iaea-chief-no-evidence-iran-seeking-nuclear-weapons-1.279355

Iran does not have a nuclear weapon. Even if they somehow made one, they do not have the technology nor the capability to strike America with the nuke. ICBMs or Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles are the delivery system for nukes and Iran does not have the technology to build a nuclear weapon nor craft a ICBM.

"Only Russia, the United States, and China are currently known to possess land-based ICBMs."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercontinental_ballistic_missile

“There exists no evidence to date to suggest that Iran can, on its own, develop or produce the individual components of a strap-down navigation and guidance system for ballistic missiles.”

Israel has several hundred nuclear Weapons. Israel has NOT signed the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty.

"Israel is presumed to have a sizable nuclear arsenal but neither confirms nor denies it. It is the only Middle East state that has not signed the NPT"

"Israel on Saturday rejected as "flawed and hypocritical" a declaration by signatories of a global anti-nuclear arms treaty that urged it to sign the pact and make its atomic facilities subject to U.N. inspections.
All 189 parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, including the United States, called on Friday in a declaration that singled out Israel for a conference in 2012 to discuss banning weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East."

"As a non-signatory state of the NPT, Israel is not obligated by the decisions of this conference, which has no authority over Israel," the Israeli government said in an emailed statement.

"Given the distorted nature of this resolution, Israel will not be able to take part in its implementation," it said."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/05/29/us-israel-nuclear-treaty-idUSTRE64S1ZN20100529

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/02/president-obama-has-reaffirmed-a-4-decade-old-secr/?page=all

Ron Paul: "Israel should not have to answer to America for how she defends herself" 1min 24 sec

"Paul was in Congress when Israel bombed Iraq’s Osirak nuclear plant in 1981 and — unlike the United Nations and the Reagan administration — Ron Paul defended Israel's right to do so."

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/22/magazine/22Paul-t.html?pagewanted=4

Benjamin Netanyahu: Israel can Defend Herself

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

I like Ron Paul, except for his Foreign Policy

I don't know how many times I've heard that phrase.

Here is my rebuttal:

After 9/11, Ron Paul voted to authorize military force to hunt down bin Laden, and authorized legislation to specifically target terrorist leaders and bring them to justice.
While Afghanistan and Iraq are turning into monstrous quagmires worse than Vietnam, it is important to note that bin Laden was killed in the manner that Ron Paul had suggested in 2001 and 2007. Instead of trillions of dollars and the tragic loss of over 3000 Americans we could have sent a specialized team to hunt down and kill bin Laden... Eventually, this was the fate of bin Laden, 10 years later with Obama taking credit for the takedown.
Ron Paul suggested bin Laden and his goons specifically targeted in 2001:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.+3076:_blank
http://www.yaliberty.org/posts/marque-and-reprisal-for-bin-laden

Obama has essentially become a dictator and is now judge, jury, and executioner ruling through executive order and backdoor dealings. Ron Paul would never send our troops into battle without a clear mission, a plan of victory, and Congressional approval/funding.
Without a clear and stated goal and without the support of the Congress, war becomes never ending and gets repackaged as "kinetic action". Vague threats from foreign countries with no nuclear arsenal and no Air Force are no threat to America's Military Might, and Ron Paul would employ the advice of our Founding Fathers before issuing preemptive strikes of aggression, an unprecedented notion in previous American History.

Republican Icon Ronald Reagan had these words to say about Ron Paul:
"Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force Officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country" -Ronald Reagan

Ron Paul will not cut defense spending. This is a common misconception.
"When asked about my intention to cut the U.S. defense budget, I am always quick to clarify that I want to cut military spending, not defense. I want America to be the most strongly defended nation in the world, but I oppose our current foreign policy that stretches our troops thin across the globe so we can play world policeman. This foolish endeavor costs us dearly in lives, and it has become far too expensive to sustain."
http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/are-cuts-to-the-defense-budget-necessary/cutting-military-spending-does-not-mean-cutting-defense-cut-military-spending-to-strengthen-us

Our Brave Men and Women in the Military Overwhelmingly Support Ron Paul:
Ask yourself why would our Military donate their hard earned money to Ron Paul? If he is indeed so whacky as Sean Hannity and Bill O Reilly would have you believe, why do our Soldiers desire Ron Paul to be the next President of the United States of America? When you begin to ponder Foreign Policy and how effective our wars are in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan go ask a Soldier don't rely on a News Personality sitting in a plush air conditioned studio.

"Dr. Paul, an Air Force veteran, raised more than $75,000 from active military in the third quarter. This comes after Dr. Paul out-raised all GOP candidates – including all GOPers combined, and President Obama singularly – in the second quarter of this year. Dr. Paul also outraised his GOP competitors in a head-to-head comparison during his 2008 run for the presidency."